- a remarkable concurrence of events or circumstances without apparent causal connection
- correspondence in nature or in time of occurrence
- Physics the presence of ionizing particles or other objects in two or more detectors simultaneously, or of two or more signals simultaneously in a circuit.
In this you'll find links and postings to other authors, theorists and philosophers. My reason for sharing is not only to make a point but also to share with you what I'm learning as I'm learning. There are those that believe they are omnipotent in their knowledge, but I surely am not. I am a student just like you. Together we bring forth a knowledge that we were destined to understand collectively.
For the moment, try and forgo the belief that you know what is going on. Since you were young, you have been collecting knowledge about what is true and what is not. From those early years you learned that those that have the truth have power. And that is when your ego began its quest to be correct.
Your ego's aspirations to be correct coincided with your early learning years. In collecting knowledge, you began to store information that you believed to be correct. Teachers, parent and friends aided in your determination of what was true and what was not. You assumed that the bodies of knowledge you were accumulating were absolute in their truth even though you recognized that there were variances. No matter where you grew up, you undoubtedly began to spend more time with those that shared your beliefs than those that differed.
For example, Christians don't spend much time with Hindus. Similarly there aren't a lot of Buddhist and Muslim mixers on a regular basis. This isn't to say that any two groups can't get along (many don't) but rather I'm attempting to distinguish that we gravitate towards people that share our beliefs, values and socio-economic class.
In our pairing, we found less instances were we were wrong. Sure, we get things wrong all the time but underlying our understanding of the world is a foundation in which we do not waiver. Christians are absolutely sure that Jesus is the Messiah. Jews and Muslims are absolutely sure He was not.
And thus we began the process of dividing Humanity. Our group is right and the others are wrong. We respect their right to be wrong but we hold out that we are right. And we really don't want to even consider that we might be wrong. Not only in our religious convictions but in many other areas of our life as well.
This brings us to a cross-roads in our life where we come face to face with the reality that we are comfortable. Furthermore, we don't seek to be uncomfortable, so we avoid that we don't agree with. But, in recognizing this, we can start to accept that our ego has brought us to this place but that we don't require this existence. We're actually much more comfortable being uncomfortable than we give ourselves credit. We know this because we would rather be uncomfortable than untrue.
In this, we area all seekers. We seek the truth. Not necessarily the truth of our companions but rather the absolute truth.
Shaky ground? You bet it is. In seeking the truth one must be mindful of untruths. But how to know the difference? We surely don't trust ourselves to know the difference. Obviously we came to this current position in life by trusting in others to know the truth and to recognize that there are other paths brings us to a place where we must admit that we may not be...true.
Today's lesson is about accepting ourselves. We fail to realize that we are perfect and that we know this is true because this is how God designed us. God is omnipotent and thus would not create anything that isn't true. This is not to say that we cannot improve nor does it mean that we aren't incapable of imperfect acts. For surely, falling from grace is central to being human.
It is hard to accept ourselves as being perfect. Judgment is rampant in our lives and we constantly compare ourselves to our image of perfection. Against this unattainable standard, we never meet the mark. However the cosmic joke in all of this is that both are perfect and, in this, we can accept ourselves.
Instead of judging yourself against perfection, try allowing yourself to not be wrong. This is all together different than being right or even allowing yourself to be wrong. Allowing yourself to not be wrong means accepting that there is no wrong.
When you find yourself comparing yourself, stop and take a breath. Accept that you are human and that you were designed to exist in a reality which contains free will. In a free will environment, human beings encounter all kinds of situations. Some of these situations will be easy and some will be hard. With every situation comes a decision. And in this decision you have a choice.
Choose correctly and you're true?
Choose incorrectly and you're wrong?
Or possibly, just choose. And learn.
I've omitted the judgment from this thought process because it provides no value. Instead, just choose and learn. And after you learn, share. Share so that others can benefit from your experience. Share because that is part of being human.
Learning does not necessitate judgment. Learning only requires input, choice and action. Do each with the awareness that you are a perfect being and you were designed to operate in an environment which tolerates more than one result. For there are many paths.
As we move through life we tend to cruise along on autopilot. We've had a long time to accept the world for how it is and one thing we've learned is that life just happens. What I mean by this is that we can sometimes cause change but we can also be passive observers of life. Even if just for a moment, we can pause and life continues. When we do this we can assume that life "just is" and that we, as passive observers, are only as relevant as our actions are causal in the results of life. Said another way, we only matter when we are in action.
In seeing life passively, we tune out the subtle connections that we have to one another. Many people believe that there is no God and many others believe that God is causal in the world. For the latter, they believe that God "sometimes" intervenes and orchestrates our lives. Regardless of where you weigh in on this debate, recognize that there are no coincidences in life. Rather there is a relationship between everything (e.g. gravitational attraction) in the Universe and life forms are no different. We are relevant regardless of our actions and the reality of our situation is not random.
When life gets out of control we find this hard to believe. The reason is that we desire to feel safe in our environment. It is natural to seek safety for life depends on survival. However one must be careful to not become deluded by connecting our elemental relationships to one another with an ability to control our reality. Our reality is founded on a free will environment and our ability to survive in this environment is not entirely in our control.
And thus we come to our lesson on coincidences. If you look at the root of this word (coincide) it reveals a meeting, alignment or connection. In this, coincidences are moments where our relationship to the Universe, God and Humanity cannot be denied. We come face to face with a reality which makes us stop in our tracks. Amazing coincidences are only amazing because we are unaware of how many times our lives coincide with others.
When we become present to our connections to the Universe, God and Humanity, we begin to understand how connected we really are in this reality. Coincidences are really awakenings to the truth of our reality and how utterly relevant we are.
There are no coincidences and you are relevant. More relevant than you can imagine. But we shall get to that.